BICKLE FAMILY vs SNUNEYMUXW BAND COUNCIL : MOOT COURT : COMPETENT JURISDICTION TO RESOLVE LAND TITLE DISPUTE : XXII

 2022 A.D.E. : CAVEAT : SINCE TIME BEGAN : salus populi suprema est lex - the right of the people is the supreme law : IN TRUTH WE TRUST : CAVEAT : 2022 A.D.E.

April 22nd

Published By : Goodwin-RC / SQYX : Emissary Kwa'mutsun

Land Titles
ETC 2 3 4 5 as related to the void Hudson's Bay Company Charter Fitzgerald Examinations / Examine : 1613 Plantagon : Yuquot : BC : Utrecht
Land Titles

GOOD DAY, CHIEF BICKLE / KATHY & BROTHER CHIEF CECILE

CC : GENERAL LEGAL COUNSEL - OPTIMAL PREFERENCE

In An Attempt To Resolve The Internal Land Dispute At Snuneymuxw Between Your Family Land Governance & The Snuneymuxw Band Council Claims I Am Postulating A Proposal To Establish A Friendly - Two Row Wampum : Peace Trust Friendship - Arena For Debate : Specifically, A MOOT COURT 
- THE DEBATE TOPIC : WHO HAS JURISDICTION TO DECIDE ON THE QUESTION OF THE BICKLE LAND CLAIM
- THE ARCHIVAL HISTORY OF THE UNION OF BC INDIAN CHIEFS AT THEIR 1969 CONFERENCE DID VOTE OVERWHELMINGLY TO DISAVOW RECEIVING FUNDING FROM THE CANADA CROWN TREASURY : "In British Columbia, Indigenous leaders decided to take measures into their own hands. Chief Dennis Alphonse of the Cowichan Band wrote to his compatriots throughout the province, proposing a meeting to discuss the consequences of the proposed policies. Fellow leaders Rose Charlie of the Indian Homemakers Association, Philip Paul of the Island Tribal Federation and Don Moses of the North American Indian Brotherhood voiced their support.
On Nov. 17, 1969, around 150 chiefs and representatives from 144 bands throughout British Columbia converged in Kamloops. It was the most representative meeting of First Nations in B.C. history. A 70-foot banner hung over those gathered, reading "B.C. Chiefs Conference - United We Stand, Divided We Perish." This message of unity not only physically hovered over the conference but was repeatedly voiced by attendees throughout the evening." ... "In 1971, at its third convention in Victoria, they officially responded to the White Paper. The UBCIC's "Brown Paper," formally known as "A Declaration of Indian Rights: The B.C. Indian Position Paper," rejected the White Paper, which had by then been abandoned by Pierre Elliott Trudeau's government following widespread uproar.    In 1971, at its third convention in Victoria, they officially responded to the White Paper. The UBCIC's "Brown Paper," formally known as "A Declaration of Indian Rights: The B.C. Indian Position Paper," rejected the White Paper, which had by then been abandoned by Pierre Elliott Trudeau's government following widespread uproar. “That Indians have survived the first one hundred years of Canada’s history is miraculous indeed,” the document began. It continued: “Governments generally have been disinterested in our problems and now the federal government proposes to absolve themselves of any responsibility for our people by one stroke of the pen: the final stroke to cover all sins of omission and commission." ... SEE UBCIC RESOLUTIONS DATA BASE
  1. DEFINITION OF MOOT COURT - A FRIENDLY VENUE FOR SCHOLARLY DEBATE ON A SPECIFIC TOPIC : DEBATING RULES WOULD BE MUTUALLY AGREED UPON IN ADVANCE : RULES OF JUSTICE WOULD SERVE AS A REFERENCE : THIS IS A QUASI-JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL QUESTION OF STANDING / ACCEPTED RIGHTS : JUST LIKE THE QUESTION OF LEGITIMACY OF THE INDIGENOUS ABSOLUTE MONARCH vs THE CANADA CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCH
  2. MISSION OF PROPOSED MOOT COURT : SNUNEYMUXW CITIZENRY WOULD VOTE ON SUPPORT OF ONE DEBATER'S ARGUMENT
  3. SNUNEYMUXW BAND COUNCIL WOULD PROVIDE - AT THEIR EXPENSE - A PUBLIC FORUM FOR THE MOOT COURT DEBATE
  4. THE DEBATE RESULT Will NOT Be COMPULSORY - THIS DEBATE @ MOOT COURT IS For EDUCATION
  5. IT WOULD BE A POSITIVE MATTER TO INVITE THIRD PARTY OBSERVERS TO WITNESS THIS MOOT COURT OF SNUNEYMUXW PEOPLES FROM OTHER JURISDICTIONS LIKE AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND : & : THE UN INDIGENOUS PEOPLES FORUM - GLOBAL MEMBERSHIP ACTION PLAN : SWAP
  6. INTEGRAL IN THIS MOOT COURT DEBATE WOULD BE QUESTIONS OF JURISDICTION OF THE "DOUGLAS TREATIES" & THE (1867 - 1982) CANADA CONSTITUTION IN MATTERS OF FREE PRIOR INFORMED CONSENT OF CONSECUTIVELY SETTLED SOVEREIGN PEOPLES SUBJECTED TO ALIEN HOSTILE MILITARY OCCUPATION FOR PURPOSES OF ACQUIRING UNJUSTIFIED WEALTH BY PIRACY - A MATTER CLEARLY RESOLVED IN 1788 AT THE EUROPEAN COURT OF UTRECHT IN THE ENGLAND vs SPAIN DISPUTE AT FRIENDLY COVE, BC WEST COAST, NOOTKA TERRITORY - WHERE THAT UTRECHT COURT RULED IN FAVOUR OF ENGLAND'S GEORGE III'S CLAIM THAT SPAIN TRESPASSED IN SEIZING HIS VESSELS AT HARBOUR; WHERE CHIEF MAQUILLA AND CHIEF CALICUM HAD SOLD THEM 100 ACRES AS A LODGE PROVISION.
  7. IMMUNITY From PROSECUTION Issues WOULD BE RELEVANT DEBATE ITEMS - ESPECIALLY, REGARDING DECOLONIZATION ISSUES
  8. SNUNEYMUXW BAND COUNCIL MAY REJECT TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROPOSED MOOT COURT - IN THIS EVENT, YOU WOULD CAUTION THEM OF YOUR INTENT TO PROCEED TO THOSE AVAILABLE INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNALS TO ACHIEVE AN ENFORCEABLE RULING - THAT YOU MAY CONSIDER PROCEEDING THROUGH ARCHIVAL REFERENCES LIKE HTG vs CANADA 2009 @ IACHR - AMONG A PLETHORA OF CASE LAWS THAT RELATE TO ADEQUATE STATE FUNDING OF FREELY CHOSEN COMPETENT LEGAL COUNSEL - LIKE AIREY vs IRELAND.
  9. ANCESTRAL HOMELAND OVERSIGHT - UNIVERSAL CLASS CLAIM - SUBMITTED TO UNITED NATIONS
  10. LEGAL COUNCIL OF CHOICE REFERENCES
  11. CUSTOM & TRADITIONAL LAW - LEGAL FEES RECOVERY PATHWAY
  12. PERHAPS, THIS MOOT COURT WOULD BE CONDUCTED IN TRADITIONAL LANGUAGE - WITH VISUAL OVERHEAD TRANSLATION
  13. IN CONJUNCTION WITH OTHER TIMELY COMPLAINTS RESOLUTION
  14. AS WITH THE RIGHT TO NAME A BIRTH CHILD BY CUSTOM & TRADITION (EIIR 1953 CORONATION OATH UNDERTAKING) - LAND TITLE IS FUNDAMENTAL TO THE CONTINUED UNFOLDING OF FREE PRIOR INFORMED CONSENT DOCTRINE - PER - TERMS GUIDE
  15. OUR KWA'MUTSUN ARCHIVES CONTINUE TO RETAIN YOUR STATEMENT OF NATIONHOOD - SIMILAR TO KWA'MUTSUN'S - IN THE GENERAL DECLARATION
  16. CLAN MOTHERS ARE FUNDAMENTAL TO RESOLVING YOUR LAND GOVERNANCE DISPUTE & ACCESS TO COMPETENT LEGAL COUNSEL OF CHOICE
YOUR PURPOSE IN THIS DEBATE IS TO CONVINCE SNUNEYMUXW PEOPLES THAT IT IS REALISTIC FOR THEM TO STOP TAKING FEDERAL MONIES & TO UNDERTAKE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT THROUGH INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS WHO WOULD ENTER INTO TRADE AGREEMENTS - LIKE THE IROQUOIS CONFEDERACY DID WITH THE DUTCH EMPIRE IN 1613 - A TRADE AGREEMENT THAT SURVIVES INTO THIS DAY

HUY'CH'QU", REGARDS, BROTHER RALPH / SQYX / OLD CROW
Victoria, BC, Regional Offices : 1003 - 360 Douglas Street, V8V 2P6     Phone   1 250 709 1809   Direct
CC : KWA'MUTSUN NATION BOARD OF GOVERNORS
Published By : Goodwin-RC / SQYX : Emissary Kwa'mutsun

2022 A.D.E. : CAVEAT : SINCE TIME BEGAN : salus populi suprema est lex - the right of the people is the supreme law : IN TRUTH WE TRUST : CAVEAT : 2022 A.D.E.