BC TREATY COMMISSION : Reverse Onus : Paramountcy : Fundamental Human / Civil Rights / Political Freedoms : KWA'MUTSUN NATION XXI

2021 A.D.E. : CAVEAT : SINCE TIME BEGAN : salus populi suprema est lex - the right of the people is the supreme law : IN TRUTH WE TRUST : CAVEAT : 2021 A.D.E.

ETC 2 3 4 5 as related to the void Hudson's Bay Company Charter Fitzgerald Examinations / Examine : 1613 : Plantagon : Yuquot : BC : Utrecht



CC : UN Secretary General - Nelson Mandela Day / UN International Law Commission / UN Special Rapporteur For Indigenous Peoples : CC

CC : Union Of BC Indian Chiefs : Assembly Of First Nations ; National Metis Association : Inuit Peoples Congress : CC

CANADA ACCESS TO INFORMATION ACT : FREEDOM OF INFORMATION IN CANADA - RANKIN

Bearing In Mind The Federal Ministry Of Justice Directives To All Crown Prosecution Offices To Equally Ensure Fair Access To The Law To Both Parties In A Dispute

British Parliamentary Records Reveal That The HBC Charter Fell Null And Void In 1696; Therefore, The British Colonial Office Was Negligent In Assigning A Contract To HBC Factor Douglas To Establish The "Douglas Treaties". Additionally, The Utrecht Court 1788 England vs Spain Decision in Favour Of George III (Title Holder Of 100 Acres In Friendly Cove) Affirmed The Sustained Indigenous Chiefs Maquilla And Calicum As Sovereign Title Holders Within Their Paramount Right To Sell The Friendly Cove Lands To British King George III (Via Captain Meares). Note, Chief Maquilla Regained Title To This Friendly Cove Per Entitlement Due To Deficiency In Property Tax Assessment Payment. The Utrecht Court Awarded Damages To England Against Spain For Trespass And Piracy For The Illicit Capture Of Meare's Ships And Lodgings At Friendly Cove ... In Summary, British Columbia Is Not Enfranchised, HBC Was Prohibited From Owning Land Titles; And, Today, Canada And British Columbia Proclaim Right To Enter Into Treaty Agreements On West Coast Lands Currently Possessed As Consecutively Settled Sovereign Lands Of Indigenous Peoples. Reverse Onus Is At Play Here. British Columbia - As A Province - Is Null And Void. And, In 1866, HBC Illicitly Sold Lands To Canada In Absence Of Legal Entitlement. Therefore, WHY DOES BC PREVAIL WITH AN INDIGENOUS TREATY COMMISSION? Your Response In A Timely Manner Is Appreciated. Huy'ch'qu' - Merci - Thank You - Miiqwich (ETC 2 3 4 5) : In The Matter Of Reverse Onus Burden : Indigenous Peoples Continue To Prevail Through The Two Row Wampum Covenant. Sidebar :  Duty Of Legal Counsel To Adequately Represent Client In Absence Of Treaty : BCSC (2017) Agreed That Legal Counsel, Having Undertaken An Oath To The Queen, Voids Absence Of Bias In Representing Indigenous Peoples / BCSC Justice Opined That Such Default Prevails Throughout The Commonwealth / As Per Transcript.

UN CHARTER : Images Are LinksTRUTH TELLING
UN CHARTER : Images Are Links : TRUTH TELLING
UN CHARTER : Images Are Links : TRUTH TELLING
UN CHARTER : Images Are Links : TRUTH TELLING
UN CHARTER : Images Are Links : TRUTH TELLING
          
2021 A.D.E. : CAVEAT : SINCE TIME BEGAN : salus populi suprema est lex - the right of the people is the supreme law : IN TRUTH WE TRUST : CAVEAT : 2021 A.D.E.